|
|
||
|
September 2014 JAPANESE UNIVERSITIES PATENT PAINKILLING DRUGS BASED ON SOUTHEAST ASIAN TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE AND PLANTS The patenting of kratom, well-known for its traditional medicinal uses in Southeast Asia call into question the degree of actual innovation contained in the Japanese work. By Edward Hammond Japanese scientists have patented pain-killing drugs from kratom (Mitragyna speciosa), a well-known Southeast Asian medicinal plant. According to the researchers, from Chiba National University and Josai University, the kratom painkillers act like opium-derived analgesics (such as morphine) and are especially useful because they do not have some of the undesirable side effects of opiates. Patents have been issued in Japan and the United States, and patent applications may be pending elsewhere. Kratom (Thai) or ketum (Malay) is a well-known plant native to Thailand, Malaysia, parts of Indonesia and the Philippines, and Papua New Guinea. Kratom has long had an important place in Southeast Asian traditional medicine. It is botanically related to coffee, but has stronger effects on its users. Because kratom can be abused as a recreational drug, its use is banned in many places. In Southeast Asian traditional medicine, different preparations of kratom are used in wound dressings, to treat the effects of fever, as a sedative, and as a substitute for opium in treatment of addicts.[1] [2] Kratom leaves are also traditionally chewed or made into tea in areas of the Malaysian peninsula, although legal prohibitions now limit this practice. In the early 2000s, Japanese researchers began analyzing compounds extracted from kratom as part of a program to assess medicinal plants. They identified one kratom compound, 7-hydroxymitragynine, as having particularly potent painkilling effects – considerably stronger, in fact, than morphine in animal experiments.[3] Yet this constituent of kratom was chemically distinct from opium poppy-derived drugs and did not paralyze the gastrointestinal system, a morphine side effect that limits the latter drug’s use. Convinced of 7-hydroxymitragynine’s pharmaceutical potential, the researchers then made chemical variations of it that are suitable for use as pharmaceuticals, and identified ways to manufacture the compounds (semi-) synthetically.
Chiba National University and Josai University have now obtained three
patents on kratom-derived drugs: US patent 8247428, issued 21 August
2012,[4] Japanese patent 5308352, issued 27
May 2013[5], and US patent
86480090, issued 11 February 2014.[6]
These patents do not appear to have entered into a regional/national
phase in Europe, but may be pending or issued in other jurisdictions,
whose data is not available online. There can be no question that traditional medicinal use of kratom very strongly anticipates the Japanese universities’ claims. Traditional use in wound dressings clearly suggests painkilling properties, as does kratom’s use to treat fevers and as a sedative. And even more particularly, its traditional use as an opium substitute directly suggests kratom’s activity on opioid receptors, the same property of the compounds patented by Chiba and Josai. These well-documented traditional medicinal uses of kratom call into question the degree of actual innovation contained in the Japanese work, as traditional knowledge guided the researchers to both kratom’s pain killing effects and indicated the specific mode of action of the patented compounds. Chiba National and Josai Universities are both located in the Tokyo metropolitan area. Whereas Chiba is a semi-governmental national university, Josai is a smaller private entity. With Japanese government support, the team of researchers that identified 7-hydroxymitragynine and then patented its derivatives is actively developing the compounds. One of the kratom-based drugs has been assigned an experimental drug name, MGM-16, and is being tested in animals.[7]
[1] Ahmad K and Z Aziz (2012). Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 141, 446–450. [2] USDA (2014). Duke's Phytochemical and Ethnobotanical Databases. URL: http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/queries.pl [3] Matsumoto K et al (2004). Life Sciences 74:2143-2155. [4] URL: https://www.google.com/patents/US8247428 [5] INPADOC (2014). Legal status: JP5308352, accessed via European Patent Office, URL: http://worldwide.espacenet.com/?locale=en_EP. [6] URL: https://www.google.com/patents/US8648090 [7] Matsumoto K et al (2014). J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 348(3):383-92. [8] See URL: http://www.sugitani.u-toyama.ac.jp/skokusai/kyoten-DataBase/2010/j02/j02-03.html [9] Chiba University (2010). The Chiba University International Collaborative Research, p. 44. -ends- About the author: Edward Hammond, a researcher and writer active on policy issues related to biodiversity, agricultural genetic resources, infectious disease, laboratory biosafety, and intellectual property. He has a website called Prickly Research (http://www.pricklyresearch.com/). When reproducing this feature, please credit Third World Network Features and (if applicable) the cooperating magazine or agency involved in the article, and give the byline. Please send us cuttings. And if reproduced on the internet, please send the web link where the article appears to twnet@po.jaring.my. 4142/14
|
||