|
||
TWN Info Service on WTO and Trade Issues (Oct07/03) 10 October 2007
Apparently
conflicting news is coming out from the On
one hand is the optimism emanating from a Below is an article that was published in the South North development Monitor (SUNS) on 26 September 2007. It is republished here with permission of the SUNS. Any re-publication or re-circulation requires the prior permission of the SUNS (sunstwn@bluewin.ch). With
best wishes
Apparently
conflicting news is coming out from the On
one hand is the optimism emanating from a At
the margins of the United Nations General Assembly meetings in According
to a Reuters report, Bush said: "We had a good discussion on At
the same press conference, Lula said that positive news on the world
trade talks could be announced in the next few days. "On the And
Amorim said that this is enough to encourage us to deeply engage in negotiations, but added that an agreement would require subsidies to be cut to closer to $13 billion. In
an earlier Reuters report, Amorim was quoted as saying that the The
Reuters report however also indicates part of the high price that the
Reaffirming
the payment that the Referring
to the NAMA draft by Ambassador Don Stephenson of Canada, which has
been severely criticized by developing countries, Schwab said: "The
countries that were signaling that they were going to be obstructionist
in terms of the [industrial goods] text: what is their stance? Ask This
is the same aggressive "blame game" tone that the USTR has
been adopting in the past few weeks, since the APEC Summit in It has prompted developing-country diplomats to expect that the US will "come out swinging" when the NAMA negotiations start in the first week of October, and demand that the developing countries agree to be subjected to industrial tariff cuts in the range of coefficients of 18 to 23 in the "Swiss formula", while developed countries undertake a range of 8 to 9. And if the developing countries continue to view these ranges as unfair, the USTR would then unleash a strong attack on them for blocking the Round's conclusion. This preparation for the blame game is especially rational, from the USTR position, because of the weak position that the Administration is in vis-a-vis the US Congress on trade issues. Whatever it is that President Bush or Susan Schwab promise, they will find it very difficult to deliver, because at the end, it is Congress that adopts trade deals. The
President's position has weakened significantly because he has lost
his fast-track trade authority, and the Democrat-controlled House and
Senate are not in a mood to approve trade deals, neither do they want
to provide Bush with a Presidential success over This
negative attitude of Congress leaders in charge of trade was revealed
in an article in the Financial Times. In his article of 24 September,
" Success in global trade negotiations will most likely have to wait until a new president is in the White House, according to senior Congress members interviewed by the FT. Charles
Rangel, the chair of the House ways and means committee, which regulates
foreign trade, said: "At this point in time I don't think we have
to deal with The
article added: "A senior aide to Max Baucus, Mr Rangel's counterpart
on the Senate finance committee, said the lack of progress in Underscoring the difficulties that the US Congress will pose for the Doha negotiations is a 20 September letter that ten Senators (seven Republicans and three Democrats) have sent to USTR Schwab asking her to oppose the text on cotton in Falconer's draft modalities paper on agriculture, and threatening to vote against a Doha agreement if the text does not change significantly. Calling
it "a matter of importance and sensitivity", the Senators
said that Falconer's language regarding cotton is opposed by the Said the letter: "Simply stated, the cotton language in the Falconer text is beyond the limit by which we can support an eventual Doha Agreement in the Senate. While the benefits of a comprehensive and multilateral agreement are great, we cannot abandon a group of farmers who have operated within the parameters of a program written to comply with the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture and the status of which continues to be adjudicated in the WTO's Dispute Settlement Body. "Treating cotton differently than all other agriculture products in the Doha Negotiations will further erode support in the US Congress for the WTO and the Administration's trade agenda. "If the cotton text in the Falconer paper does not change significantly, we will have no other choice but to vote against the Doha Agreement should it come before us for debate. Furthermore, if the Administration fails to address our concerns, support for trade promotion authority in the future will be severely compromised." The Republican Senators who signed were Saxby Chambliss, Johnny Isakson, Lindsey Graham, Thad Cochran, Richard Burr, Elizabeth Dole, David Vitter, and the Democrat Senators were Blanche Lincoln, Mark Pryor, and Mary Landrieu. Cotton is a highly emotional issue of high priority, especially with African delegations which have also generally supported the Falconer language on cotton. Thus, a move to change it significantly can be expected to cause a lot of dissatisfaction.
|