Info Service on WTO and Trade Issues (May19/11)
Geneva, 15 May (Kanaga Raja) – China has tabled a comprehensive proposal on reform of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) that amongst others calls for resolving the crucial and urgent issues threatening the existence of the WTO and enhancing the inclusiveness of the multilateral trading system.
Among the urgent issues that need to be resolved, the Chinese proposal said, are the appointment process of Appellate Body members which should be initiated without delay so as to ensure the effective functioning of the dispute settlement mechanism.
China also said WTO Members should act in good faith and exercise restraint in invoking provisions on national security exceptions.
It is also necessary to effectively curb unilateralist measures of raising trade barriers and imposing import tariffs in an arbitrary way and without authorization from the WTO, said China.
In its 8-page proposal circulated on 13 May (WT/GC/W/773), China said that the necessary reform of the WTO should cover the following four areas for concrete actions: resolving the crucial and urgent issues threatening the existence of the WTO; increasing the WTO’s relevance in global economic governance; improving the operational efficiency of the WTO; and enhancing the inclusiveness of t he multilateral trading system.
China said it supports necessary reform of the WTO so as to overcome its existential crisis, enhance its authority and efficacy, and increase its relevance in terms of global economic governance.
To this end, China said it put forward in November 2018 the following three basic principles on WTO reform:
First, the reform shall preserve such core values of the multilateral trading system as non-discrimination and openness, with a view to creating a stable and predictable environment for international trade.
Second, the reform shall safeguard the development interests of developing Members.
In particular, said China, it is imperative to eliminate the development deficit in the existing WTO rules, resolve the difficulties encountered by developing Members in their integration into economic globalization and help attain th e Sustainable Development Goals of United Nations 2030 Agenda.
Third, the reform shall follow the practice of decision-making by consensus. The specific issues subject to reform, work agenda and final results should be agreed upon after extensive consultations, on the basis of mutual respect, broad participation and dialogues on an equal footing.
China believes that the multilateral process is the most desirable channel to promote liberalization and facilitation of trade and investment on a global scale.
At the same time, opportunities and challenges have been brought about by the new wave of the science and technology revolution and transformational power of the digital economy.
“In this context, we may consider an open, transparent, inclusive, pragmatic and flexible approach to explore a new set of rules on international trade and investment, responding to the developments of the times and the needs of business communities. In this process, the interests and capacity constraints of developing Members should be taken into full account,” China suggested.
In its communication, China said the world’s economic landscape is undergoing profound changes. With the rise of unilateralism and protectionism, economic globalization is encountering twists and turns. The authority and efficacy of the multilateral trading system are facing severe challenges.
Against this backdrop, China said it supports “efforts to make necessary reform to the WTO, in order to help it tackle the current crisis, respond to the needs of our times, safeguard the multilateral trading system and promote the building of an open world economy.”
International trade is an important engine for growth of the global economy . The multilateral trading system, with the WTO at its centre, is the cornerstone of economic globalization and free trade.
As an important pillar of global economic governance, the WTO has, since it s inception, made remarkable contributions to expanding international trade, promoting full employment, stimulating economic growth and raising standards of living, said China.
In the past 24 years, the membership of the WTO has kept increasing with the total trade volume of its Members accounting for 98% of the world’s total, which fully demonstrates the representativeness of the multilateral trading system and its appeal to the membership.
World merchandise exports have increased from US$4.3 trillion in 1994 to US$17.7 trillion in 2017, lifting hundreds of millions of people out of poverty around the world and significantly raising the living standards of citizens of relevant countries and regions.
In the fields of trade liberalization and facilitation, the WTO has made a number of important achievements. The conclusion and full implementation of the Agreement on Trade Facilitation are expected to reduce the costs of global trade by 14% and would generate US$1 trillion in additional global trade each year.
The full elimination of agricultural export subsidies is conducive to levelling the playing field for agricultural trade.
The elimination of tariffs on IT (information technology) products has increased the export of the products covered from US$549 billion in 1996 to US$1.7 trillion in 2015.
All these have contributed tremendously to the recovery and growth of the world economy, said China.
It noted that in the field of dispute settlement, 574 dispute cases have been filed with the WTO dispute settlement mechanism by the end of 2018.
The mechanism has been playing an important role in resolving trade disputes, preserving the balance of the rights and obligations of the Members under the WTO agreements and providing security and predictability to the multilateral trading system.
In the area of trade policy review and monitoring, more than 430 trade policy reviews (TPRs) have been conducted, covering 155 of the 164 WTO Members.
TPRs have significantly increased the transparency of Members’ trade policies and deepened their understanding of each other’s trade regime.
China, however, said that the recent trend of rising unilateralist and protectionist practices have dealt blows to multilateralism and the system of free trade.
“The enduring blockage of the appointment process of Appellate Body members risks paralysing the Appellate Body by the end of 2019, which will significantly affect the effective operation of the dispute settlement mechanism,” it warned.
The abuse of the national security exception, unilateral measures inconsistent with the WTO rules, as well as misuse or abuse of existing trade remedy measures have severely damaged the rules-based, free and open international trade order.
Moreover, such practices have adversely affected the interests of the WTO Members, especially the developing Members, and undermined the authority and efficacy of the WTO.
“As a consequence, the Organization is facing an unprecedented existential crisis,” said China, pointing out, however, that the WTO itself “is not impeccable.”
The objectives set out in the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization have not yet been fully attained.
As for its function of negotiations, progress has been slow on issues such as agriculture, development and rules, although it has been seventeen years since the launch of the Doha Development Round.
In China’s view, such new issues as electronic commerce and investment facilitation that reflect the reality of international economy and trade in the 21st century have not been timely addressed.
By contrast, remarkable progress and achievements have been made in the field of trade liberalization and facilitation through bilateral and regional trade agreements.
As for the WTO’s function of trade policy review and monitoring, transparency of trade policies of its Members awaits enhancement and the operational efficiency of the WTO stands in need of improvement.
PROPOSED AREAS FOR ACTION
According to China, among the crucial and urgent issues threatening the existence of the WTO that need to be resolved are breaking the impasse of the appointment process of Appellate Body members.
As a pillar of the WTO, the dispute settlement mechanism plays a crucial role in providing security and predictability to the multilateral trading system, it said.
If the blockage of the appointment process of Appellate Body members continues, there will be only one Appellate Body member left in office by December 2019.
“Such a situation would severely threaten the proper functioning of the dispute settlement mechanism and therefore pose an imminent and institutional risk to the Organization,” it said.
The appointment process of Appellate Body members should be initiated without delay to fill the vacancies so as to ensure the effective functioning of the dispute settlement mechanism.
China noted that together with some other WTO Members, it had submitted joint proposals on the Appellate Body reform, urging Members to actively participate in the informal process under the auspices of the General Council and engage in substantive text-based discussions.
These efforts are made to address the concerns of certain Members such as the transitional rules for outgoing Appellate Body members, 90-day timeframe for appellate proceedings, the status of municipal law, findings unnecessary for dispute resolution and the issue of precedent.
The proposals also emphasize the need to preserve and reinforce the independence and impartiality of the Appellate Body and to initiate the appointment process of the Appellate Body members without any further delay.
China also called for tightening the disciplines to curb the abuse of the national security exception, saying that a certain Member (in reference to the United States) has imposed unwarranted tariffs on steel and aluminium products and threatened to raise tariffs on auto and auto parts to protect its domestic industries, using national security as a pretext.
It has also improperly extended the coverage of export control measures and administered such measures in a non-transparent or unjust manner.
“These actions have disturbed the international trade order and international market, impeded normal technological exchanges and applications, impaired the interests of Members concerned and undermined the relevant rules of the WTO,” said China.
The WTO Members should act in good faith and exercise restraint in invoking provisions on national security exceptions. Such provisions need to be further clarified and regulated within the WTO framework, it suggested.
It is also necessary to enhance the notification requirements on measures such as imposing import tariffs on the ground of national security exceptions, and carry out multilateral reviews on such measures.
“Meanwhile, WTO Members whose interests have been affected should be entitled to take prompt and effective remedies, so as to maintain the balance of their rights and obligations under the WTO.”
China further called for tightening disciplines to curb unilateral measures inconsistent with the WTO rules.
It said that a certain Member (again in reference to the United States) has taken unilateralist measures of raising trade barriers and imposing import tariffs in an arbitrary way and without authorization from the WTO.
In addition, it has imposed economic sanctions on other countries and extended “secondary sanctions” to overseas business activities of third-country nationals or companies, without authorization from the United Nations or legal basis under international treaties.
Such actions have severely violated international commitments and the WTO rules. Although such unilateralist measures are manifestly WTO-inconsistent and have caused serious consequences, the current WTO rules offer no timely or effective discipline and remedy.
China said that it is necessary to effectively curb such unilateralist measures, reinvigorate the efficiency and authority of the WTO, safeguard the rules-based multilateral trading system and protect the legitimate rights of the WTO Members.
“Such unilateralist measures should be constrained through, inter alia, enhancing the multilateral review mechanism, authorizing the Members affected to take prompt and effective provisional remedies in cases of urgency and accelerating relevant dispute settlement proceedings.”
INCREASING THE RELEVANCE OF THE WTO
China also proposed several actions with respect to increasing the relevance of the WTO in global economic governance.
These include rectifying the inequity in the rules on agriculture; improving the trade remedy rules; accelerating negotiations on fisheries subsidies; advancing the joint (plurilateral) initiative on the trade-related aspects of e-commerce in an open and inclusive manner; and promoting discussions on new issues.
On agriculture, it said that significant inequity, imbalance and unfairness persist in current rules on agriculture, in particular the provisions regarding the Aggregate Measurement of Support (AMS).
A number of developed Members enjoy high levels of AMS and therefore are able to provide much higher levels of support than their de minimis level with respect to a number of specific products, seriously distorting agricultural production and trade.
By contrast, the majority of developing Members have no entitlement to AMS. Furthermore, they could not implement domestic public stockholding programmes necessary for food security purposes.
It is necessary to rectify the inequity in rules on agriculture so as to promote agricultural trade and create a level playing field for developing Members. It is also necessary to enhance their abilities to safeguard food security and livelihood security so that they could benefit more from the multilateral trading system, said China.
The AMS entitlements of developed Members should be eliminated in gradual instalments. In the meanwhile, Members should reach an agreement on the permanent solution for public stockholding for food security purposes, it suggested.
On the issue of improving the trade remedy rules, China noted that at present, there exist a number of gaps and ambiguities in existing multilateral trade remedy rules. Misuse and abusive application of trade remedy measures abound.
Discriminatory practices based on country-of-origin and types of enterprises have been on the rise. The special situations of developing Members and SMEs (small and medium enterprises) as well as the public interests are not accorded ad equate or appropriate consideration.
As a result, trade remedy rules have failed to exert their due functions or respond to the needs of the development of the multilateral trading system to the detriment of the normal course of international trade.
It is necessary to further clarify and improve relevant WTO rules on subsidies, countervailing measures and anti-dumping measures.
“We should curb the misuse and abuse of trade remedies, eliminate discriminatory rules and practices, and give consideration to the special situations of developing Members and SMEs as well as public interests,” China suggested.
In this way, the spirit and principles of relevant agreements of the WTO could be more faithfully honoured and free trade and levelling the playing field better safeguarded. Such improvements of rules could answer to the needs of the world and the WTO Members for sustainable development.
Firstly, China proposed that the provisions on non-actionable subsidies should be reinstated and their coverage expanded.
Second, efforts need to be made to clarify and improve relevant rules on and relating to price comparison in anti-dumping proceedings, improve the rules on sunset review and explore the possibility of harmonizing the rules on anti-circumvention.
Third, the subsidies and countervailing rules relating to subsidy identification, calculation of benefits conferred and application of facts available should be clarified and improved to mitigate abusive applications of countervailing measures.
Fourth, transparency and due process of anti-dumping and countervailing investigations should be improved and the assessment of their effectiveness and compliance be reinforced.
Fifth, more consideration should be given to the special situations of developing Members and SMEs as well as public interests.
In calling for accelerating the negotiations on fisheries subsidies, China said that the negotiations on fisheries subsidies are among the areas where the WTO could help achieve the Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations 2030 Agenda. Swift conclusion of the negotiations is important.
It is necessary to conclude the negotiations on fisheries subsidies in accordance with the decision adopted by the 11th WTO Ministerial Conference.
The agreement to be reached should provide comprehensive and effective disciplines to prohibit certain forms of fisheries subsidies contributing to overcapacity and overfishing and to eliminate subsidies contributing to illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing.
On advancing the joint initiative on trade-related aspects of E-commerce, China said E-commerce has created unprecedented opportunities for international trade and economic growth. Meanwhile, the digital divide still needs to be bridged.
Issues such as cyber security and data security have gained in prominence. Members, particularly developing Members, have their own challenges in developing E-commerce. And they have diversified interests and concerns with respect to international rules on E-commerce.
However, in the past two decades, the WTO did not launch the rule-making process on trade-related aspects of E-commerce.
China maintained that business communities have made a strong call for E-commerce rules. It is important for Members to work on pro-multilateral rules.
Such efforts will be conducive to bolstering inclusive trade, revitalizing the WTO negotiating function and enhancing the relevance of the multilateral trading system.
These rules, once agreed upon, would create new opportunities of international trade for Members, particularly developing Members, as well as SMEs, women and youth. With these rules in place, E-commerce will generate more benefits for businesses, consumers and the global economy.
China and 75 other WTO Members issued a joint statement on E-commerce, confirming their intention to commence negotiations on trade-related aspects of E-commerce on the basis of existing WTO agreements and framework.
China proposed the following actions: First, conduct the rule-making process in an open, transparent, inclusive and flexible manner, and welcome participation of all Members.
Second, uphold the development dimension and focus on cross-border trade in goods enabled by the Internet, as well as on such related services as payment and logistics services; and establish rules on cross-border E-commerce facilitation, electronic signature, electronic authentication, and online consumer protection etc.
Third, formulate provisions on development cooperation so as to strengthen technical assistance and capacity building for developing Members, particularly least-developed country Members.
Fourth, respect Members’ right to regulate and accommodate specific concerns of developing Members.
Fifth, strike the balance among technological advances, business development and such legitimate public policy objectives as Internet sovereignty, data security and privacy protection, so as to reach a balanced and pragmatic outcome acceptable to all through equal consultations.
Sixth, continue in-depth discussions in relevant WTO bodies pursuant to the Work Programme on Electronic Commerce in 1998.
On promoting discussions on new issues, China said that trade and investment are closely interlinked in today’s world underlined by the in-depth development of global value chains. Investment facilitation measures play an increasingly important role in improving business environment, attracting inbound cross-border investment and promoting trade and sustainable development.
However, said China, cross-border investment by businesses is still hindered by opaque policies and government inefficiencies. Micro, small and medium sized enterprises (MSMEs) make significant contributions to job creation and technology innovation.
However, they are confronted with challenges in connecting to global value chains, such as limited access to information and high costs of trade financing.
It is crucial to meet the development needs of business communities and to promote inclusive trade, so as to ensure the multilateral trading system keep pace with the times, said China.
“Continued efforts should be made to bring the discussions on relevant issues into a new phase while adhering to the principles of openness, transparency and inclusiveness.”
On investment facilitation, a dedicated mechanism should be established to enable Members to carry out efficient policy coordination and explore the establishment of a multilateral framework.
This process should focus on such elements as improving transparency, streamlining administrative procedures and enhancing international cooperation, while paying due respect to Members’ right to regulate.
With the process centring on development, developing Members will benefit from technical assistance and capacity building.
On MSMEs, those enterprises could better participate in and benefit more from international trade with improved access to information, easier corporate financing and reduced trade costs.
China also called for improving the operational efficiency of the WTO, in particular improving the compliance of notification obligations, and improving the efficiency of the WTO’s subsidiary bodies.
On improving the compliance of notification obligations, China said at present, Members’ overall fulfilment of notification obligations still falls short of the requirements under various WTO agreements.
Due to their limited capacity and other constraints, some Members could not submit the notifications on time. Meanwhile, the quality of counter-notifications submitted by some Members still needs further improvement.
“It is imperative to enhance the transparency of Members’ trade policies. Greater transparency will help create an open, stable, predictable, equitable and transparent international trading environment, and raise Members’ confidence in the multilateral trading system,” said China.
Among the actions proposed by China in this regard are that firstly, developed Members should lead by example in submitting comprehensive, timely and accurate notifications.
Second, Members should improve the quality of their counter-notifications. Third, Members should increase exchange of their experiences on notifications.
Fourth, the WTO Secretariat needs to update the Technical Cooperation Handbook on Notifications as soon as possible and intensify training in this regard.
Fifth, developing Members should also endeavour to improve their compliance of notification obligations.
Technical assistance and capacity building should be provided to developing Members, in particular LDCs, if they are unable to fulfil notification obligations on time.
On improving the efficiency of the WTO subsidiary bodies, China said that the potentials and functions of the subsidiary bodies of the WTO have not been fully tapped.
Some issues on the agenda of the regular meetings have not been resolved despite prolonged discussions for years. There is considerable room for improving the operational efficiency of the subsidiary bodies.
It is important to elevate the WTO’s role in global economic governance. In this regard, its subsidiary bodies and the Secretariat should find ways to better respond to the interests and needs of Members.
Viable options should be explored to improve the efficiency of the WTO in the following areas, among others:
First, improve the rules of procedures of the subsidiary bodies. Second, adjust the frequency of regular meetings in light of the specific situation of each body.
Third, encourage the Secretariat to conduct more research on important economic and trade issues, enhance cooperation with other international organizations, and help developing Members address and resolve specific trade concerns at regular meetings.
Fourth, further improve the representation of developing Members in the Secretariat and steadily increase their share in the staff.
China further proposed strengthening the inclusiveness of the multilateral trading system. In this context, it underlined the need to respect the right of special and differential treatment (S&DT) of developing members.
It said the development issue is at the centre of the WTO work. The WTO agreements have set forth special and differential treatment (S&DT) provisions for developing Members.
However, most of these provisions are best-endeavour clauses in nature and their implementation leaves much to be desired.
Furthermore, some Members are challenging the entitlement of developing Members to S&DT, disregarding the systemic gaps between developing and developed Members. They even request some developing Members to assume the same obligations as those of developed Members.
Development remains an important theme of the times. It is crucial for the WTO to safeguard the rights of developing Members to S&DT and make S&DT provisions more precise, effective and operational, said China.
“This will be conducive to reducing the development deficit in trade rules and contributing to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations 2030 Agenda.”
China, together with some other WTO Members, has submitted a joint proposal on S&DT and calls for continued preservation of the rights of developing Members to S&DT.
China said that it further proposes the following: First, enhance the implementation and monitoring of existing S&DT provisions, particularly the implementation of Duty-Free and Quota-Free treatment and the Preferential Treatment to Services and Service Suppliers of the LDCs.
Second, provide more targeted and concrete technical assistance to ensure the integration of developing Members into the multilateral trading system and global value chains.
Third, advance the negotiations on S&DT provisions in accordance with the Doha Ministerial Declaration.
Fourth, accord adequate and effective S&DT treatment to developing Members in future negotiations on trade and investment rules.
Fifth, encourage developing Members to actively assume obligations commensurate with their level of development and economic capability.
China also called for adhering to the principle of fair competition in trade and investment, saying that State- owned-enterprises (SOEs) engaged in commercial competition are equal players in the market as other types of enterprises.
However, some Members have come to set differentiated rules on the basis of ownership of enterprises, it said.
For example, they label indiscriminately all SOEs as “‘public bodies” within the meaning of the Agreement of Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, set fort h additional transparency requirements and disciplines for SOEs, and discriminate against SOEs in foreign investment security review.
“Such practices are detrimental to creating an institutional framework for fair competition and, if left unchecked, would give rise to more discriminatory rules in the future,” it said.
It is imperative to respect the diversity of development models among Members and promote fair competition in the fields of trade and investment. Such efforts would strengthen the inclusiveness of the multilateral trading system.
Actions shall be taken in the WTO to uphold the principle of fair competition, so as to ensure that enterprises of different ownerships operate in an environment of fair competition.
China proposed the following: First, during discussions on subsidy disciplines, no special or discriminatory disciplines should be instituted on SOEs in the name of WTO reform.
Second, foreign investment security reviews shall be conducted in an impartial manner and follow such principles as transparency and due process.
Non-discriminatory treatment shall be given to like investment by enterprises with different ownership structures, it said.