|
||
TWN
Info Service on UN Sustainable Development (Nov14/02) Dear friends and colleagues, In
view of the Third Conference on Financing for Development that will
be held in July 2015 in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, a position paper has
been written by Afrodad, Eurodad, Latindadd, JSAPMDD and Third World
Network. Titled: "UN Financing for Development negotiations:
What outcomes should be agreed in Addis Ababa in 2015?" the
paper is open for endorsements by other civil society organisations
and networks before 5th December 2014. If you want to
endorse it please send an email with your logo to Hernán Cortés (hcortes@eurodad.org). Executive Summary 2015
will be a landmark year for the global fight against poverty and for
equitable and sustainable development, with three crucial summits
in just six months. A central issue for all three summits is concrete
proposals for reforms to international financial and trade systems
so that they support the achievement of global sustainable development
goals. Such reforms should be based on the right to development for
all countries and ensuring economic and social rights for all. There
are sufficient funds available to achieve human rights for all, end
poverty and to achieve global sustainable development goals: but political
decisions to change structures and systems are needed to make this
possible. On these issues, the Third UN Conference on Financing for
Development (FfD) in Addis Ababa in July will play a critical role.
2: Foreign direct investment and other international private flows. A much more balanced approach to private international finance is needed, recognising risks and the need for developing countries to manage flows carefully. There are two different categories of concerns. On the one hand, there are macroeconomic risks associated with these flows, such as the volatility of short-term financial flows. On the other hand, there are concerns in relation to the content and terms of longer term investment, especially Foreign Direct Investment (FDI). Our key recommendations are:
3: International trade. Trade policy should allow developing countries to have policy space, including the ability to focus on impacts on unemployment, vulnerable people, gender equality and sustainable development, and should not promote liberalisation as an end in itself. International trade plays an important role in development, and trade policies are an important tool that developing countries can use to support the growth of domestic industries with greater added value, not just as commodity producers. However the current trade regime has pushed developing countries to open their markets, both through the World Trade Organisation (WTO) and through regional and bilateral trade and investment treaties, which reduces their policy space to address their development needs while doing little to address rich-country trade-distorting policies. We recommend:
4: Official Development Assistance (ODA) and other international public support for development. Strengthened commitments to improving the quality and quantity of ODA are needed, with much firmer follow up mechanisms, as are new and additional sources of public finance. ODA remains a critical resource, particularly for the poorest countries, but its value has been severely undermined by failures of rich countries to meet the UN target to provide 0.7% of their Gross National Income (GNI) as ODA and lack of progress on the Paris/Accra/Busan commitments on aid effectiveness to stop the bad practices that significantly undermine ODA. Innovative public financing mechanisms can provide much needed additional resources. Our key recommendations are:
5: External debt. The recent UNGA resolution (A/RES/68/304 in 2014) that mandates the “establishment of a multilateral legal framework for sovereign debt restructuring processes” is a critically important opportunity to put in place effective international mechanisms for preventing and resolving future crises: it must not be wasted. Debt crises risk wiping out the global development progress made over decades. Even in countries that do not suffer from an acute debt crisis, debt service competes with development spending for limited public resources. Despite promises made at Monterrey, the architecture for debt crisis prevention and management has not been developed. Debt crises continue to be addressed too late and too slowly. Our key recommendations are:
6: Systemic issues: effective, inclusive global governance and monetary system reform. The system of global economic governance is in urgent need of overhaul to give developing countries a fair and equitable seat at the decision-making table at all international organisations and financial institutions, strengthen transparency and accountability, and to tackle key international problems, while respecting developing countries’ policy space. While the shift from the G8 to the G20 as the focus of global economic discussion signalled a change in power dynamics, the G20 is proving inadequate and ineffective at global coordination, while legitimate UN bodies do not have the mandate or resources to coordinate effectively in this area. The international monetary system is built on an unsustainable role for the US dollar, which needs to be gradually replaced as the world’s reserve currency, while at the same time building additional stability into the system by increasing the reserve assets available to developing countries. We recommend:
7: Other important issues. We highlight four in particular that require additional attention:
The above are a summary of the key recommendations that are set out in clear detail below, with supporting evidence that shows why these and other key issues should be at the centre of the Addis FfD conference.
|