Dear
Friends and Colleagues
Strengthening Interlinkages Between Agriculture and Biodiversity
Critical to Global Food Security
Since
1993, the Trondheim Conferences on Biodiversity have provided a valuable
forum for dialogue amongst stakeholders on key issues relating to
implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). Against
the backdrop of the CBD's Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020
and its 20 Aichi Biodiversity Targets as the framework for action,the
8th Trondheim Conference, held from 31 May to 3 June 2016,
focused on the complex interlinkages between agriculture and biodiversity.
The Conference recognized that unless these are properly understood,
it would be difficult to bring about effective change.
By
2030, world population will be 8.5 billion and food demand will have
increased. Yet 70% of essential crop wild relative species are already
in need of protection while 17% of livestock breeds are at risk of
extinction. The Conference recognized that such statistics showed
that the current model of food production was not sustainable and
focused on how to build “food systems for a sustainable future”. Some
of the key findings of the Conference are as follows:
·
Biodiversity and ecosystem services are essential in supporting agriculture
in multiple ways. Increased focus on the value of biodiversity to
agriculture and food production can deliver very positive outcomes,
for example, diversity in and around farmers’ fields can significantly
reduce pests and decrease disease damage.
·
Access to genetic diversity can be increased through a range of public
and private approaches, and benefit sharing can be a major opportunity
for stakeholder engagement. Gender and social inclusion is a significant
issue for ensuring full engagement of all relevant stakeholders.
·
There is a need to build food systems that meet increased demand while
remaining profitable and sustainable in the face of climate change.
Conserving local varieties and landraces is one way to support adaptation
to climate change.
·
It is feasible to move away from intensive and industrial agricultural
practices to make food systems more ethical. Multifunctional agricultural
landscapes can be an effective means for increasing understanding
of interlinkages and moving towards sustainability.
·
Increasing cooperation between biodiversity and agriculture sectors
is critical to achieving both the Sustainable Development Goals(SDGs)
and the Aichi Biodiversity Targets.
The
first thematic report of the International Panel of Experts on Sustainable
Food Systems (IPES-Food), 'From
Uniformity to Diversity: A paradigm shift from industrial agriculture
to diversified agroecological systems' was launched at the Conference.
Its key message, of the need to transition from input-intensive crop
monocultures and industrial-scale feedlots towards a diversification
of agriculture and reorientation around ecological practices, resonated
well with the Conference theme and identified agroecology as exemplary
of the interlinkages between biodiversity and agriculture.
With
best wishes,
Third
World Network
131 Jalan Macalister
10400 Penang
Malaysia
Email: twn@twnetwork.org
Websites: http://www.biosafety-info.net/and
http://www.twn.my/
To subscribe to other TWN information services: www.twnnews.net ______________________________________________________________________________
FOOD
SYSTEMS FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE:
INTERLINKAGES BETWEEN BIODIVERSITY AND AGRICULTURE
SUMMARY
FINDINGS FROM THE REPORT OF THE CO-CHAIRS
Trondheim
Conferences on Biodiversity
The Eighth Conference; Trondheim 31 May – 3 June 2016
http://www.miljodirektoratet.no/Global/English/Arrangements/
TK8/TC8%20Summary%20Findings%20(FINAL).pdf
Full report: http://www.miljodirektoratet.no/Global/English/
Arrangements/TK8/TC8%20Co-Chair%20Report%20(FINAL).pdf
Key facts:
Statistics such as these taken from speakers’ presentations
help illustrate various dimensions of the interrelationship
between agriculture and biodiversity:
- by 2030
world population will be 8.5 billion
- by 2030
food demand will have increased by 50%
- even today
795 million people are under-nourished
- just 3 crop
species (wheat, rice and maize) represent 48% of average daily
calories consumed
- genebanks
around the world hold some 3.6 million crop accessions, half
from 9 major crop species
- 70% of essential
crop wild relative species are in need of protection
- 17% of livestock
breeds are known to be at risk of extinction, another 58%
are yet to be assessed
- smallholder
farms (less than 2 hectares) represent over 475 million of
the world’s 570 million farms
- each year
production on permanent cropland and arable land increases
by 2-4% while the area cultivated increases only 1%
- drivers linked
to agriculture account for 70% of the projected loss of terrestrial
biodiversity
- globally 33%
of our soils are degraded
- around one
third of the food produced in the world for human consumption
is lost or wasted
- greenhouse
gas emissions from agricultural systems contribute 11% of
total global warming potential
References at the
end of the document
The figures suggest that continuing to produce food and feed
people in the way we have is not sustainable. Yet we have many
examples of sustainable agricultural practices. It is in this
context that the conference addressed Food Systems for a Sustainable
Future.
|
SETTING
THE SCENE: CONTEXT FOR PROMOTING INTERLINKAGES BETWEEN BIODIVERSITY
AND AGRICULTURE: In 2015 the United Nations General Assembly adopted
the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development with 17 Sustainable Development
Goals. While the goals relate to work in different sectors, they are
highly interdependent. In 2010, Parties to the Convention on Biological
Diversity adopted the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 and
its 20 Aichi Biodiversity Targets. These targets have been broadly
accepted as a framework for action for the conservation and sustainable
use of biological diversity. Achievement of these goals and targets
would be highly relevant for improving food systems and agricultural
sustainability.
- Food
security now and in the future is one of the big issues of our time,
and an issue with multiple dimensions
- Sustainable
agriculture requires an integrated approach to working with different
sectors and stakeholders at multiple levels
- Biodiversity
and ecosystem services are essential in supporting agriculture in
multiple ways and at all levels, and interlinkages should be seen
as an opportunity
- Integrating
biodiversity and ecosystem services into other sectors, including
agriculture and food production, is an essential step in achieving
the SDGs
- While
there is a clear imperative to achieve food security and nutrition,
this is not a simple issue as a result of regional imbalances in
population growth, diet and nutrition
- It
is necessary for stakeholders with different yet compatible interests
to work closely together to catalyse this shift towards sustainability
- It
is essential to be aware of the scale at which the issue under discussion
is experienced or responded to
- Recognising
that the title of the conference was very broad in scope, it was
decided to focus on production of crops and livestock
INTERLINKAGES
BETWEEN BIODIVERSITY AND AGRICULTURE: IMPERATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS:
Understanding of the importance of biodiversity and ecosystem services
for agriculture and food and nutrition security is increasing as the
result of a range of ongoing initiatives, and this can form the basis
for developing future joint agendas with mutual benefits.
- Biodiversity
provides the raw materials that produce the plant varieties and
animal breeds upon which agriculture and food systems depend
- The
range of genetic diversity within farmed animals and plants declines
with production intensification
- Increased
focus on the value of biodiversity to agriculture and food production
can deliver very positive messages
- Animal
pollinators play a vital role in food production, as more than three
quarters of the leading types of global food crops rely to some
extent on animal pollination for yield and/or quality
- The
vast majority of pollinator species are wild, including more than
20,000 species of bees
- Diversity
in and around farmers’ fields can significantly reduce pests and
decrease disease damage
- Soils
deliver multiple ecosystem services that enable life on earth, including
delivery of food, fibre and fuel, carbon sequestration, water purification,
climate regulation, nutrient cycling, habitat and flood regulation
- However,
despite their importance, most of the world’s soil resources are
in only fair, poor or very poor condition
- Without
integrated review and assessment, many of the contributions of biodiversity
and ecosystem services to agriculture are “invisible” and under-valued
Developments
in agriculture have raised hundreds of millions of people out of poverty,
yet at the same time agricultural activities can have significant
adverse impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Agriculture
and food systems also have other significant environmental impacts.
Increase in food production could well lead to further impacts, and
consideration may need to be given to trade-offs between the agendas
and concerns of different sectors.
- It
is important to appreciate that some agricultural practices have
significant negative impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services,
and on other environmental issues addressed by the SDGs
- Increasing
cooperation between biodiversity and agriculture sectors is critical
to achieving both the SDGs and the Aichi Biodiversity Targets
INTERLINKAGES
BETWEEN BIODIVERSITY AND AGRICULTURE: POLICIES AND INSTITUTIONS: There
are many examples of how interlinkages between biodiversity and agriculture
can be further developed to the benefit of both sectors. Lessons from
such examples will help in building understanding of what can be done
in the future to increase cooperation and collaboration, and how this
can be achieved.
- Institutions
working at the interface between agriculture and biodiversity can
play a significant role
- A
systematic approach to spatial planning can be a valuable tool for
supporting biodiversity mainstreaming and agricultural production
- There
are a number of key challenges in implementing mainstreaming approaches,
which require targeted actions
- Access
to genetic diversity can be increased through a range of public
and private approaches, and benefit sharing can be a major opportunity
for stakeholder engagement
- As
a part of this, the importance of community seed banks was recognised
- Gender
and social inclusion is a significant issue for ensuring full engagement
of all relevant stakeholders
- Accounting
systems often overlook the values of biodiversity and ecosystem
services, resulting in them not being taken into account
- Accounting
systems that incorporate a full understanding of the values of biodiversity
and ecosystem services can be significant drivers for changes in
approach
INTERLINKAGES
BETWEEN BIODIVERSITY AND AGRICULTURE: PLANNING FOR A CHANGING CLIMATE:
Achieving food security and ensuring the conservation and sustainable
use of biodiversity and ecosystem services are both threatened by
climate change, and the increasingly severe weather conditions experienced
in certain regions of the world. These issues need to be taken into
account in considering the interlinkages between biodiversity and
agriculture.
- Scenarios
and models can be used in a variety of ways to explore understanding
on the interlinkages between biodiversity, agriculture and climate
change
- Climate
change impacts for agriculture are already apparent
The
Paris Agreement adopted by Parties to the United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change in December 2015 explicitly recognises
that food production systems are vulnerable to the adverse impacts
of climate change, and that food production should not be compromised
by the global response to the threat of climate change. The agreement
also refers to the importance of maintaining ecosystem integrity and
resilience when planning and implementing response to climate change.
- There
is a need to build food systems that meet increased demand while
remaining profitable and sustainable in the face of climate change
- Biocultural
assessments that focus on the relationship between communities and
their environments, are particularly useful for exploring the roles
and aspirations of local communities
- Conserving
local varieties and land races is one of the actions that can be
taken to support adaptation to climate change
- Linkages
between trade, climate change, agriculture, and biodiversity conservation
also need to be considered
INTERLINKAGES
BETWEEN BIODIVERSITY AND AGRICULTURE: CHANGING PRACTICES: With
the need to feed an increasing world population and to address concerns
about equity in access to food and nutrition, there will inevitably
be changes in agriculture and food production systems. This is both
a potential threat to biodiversity and ecosystem services, and an
opportunity to take action to change practices.
- Multifunctional
agricultural landscapes can be an effective means for increasing
understanding of interlinkages and moving towards sustainability
- The
interlinkages between biodiversity and agriculture are complex,
but unless these interlinkages are properly understood it will be
difficult to bring about effective change
- However,
understanding these interlinkages also requires a clearer understanding
of the specific products and production systems, and how the products
are used
- Promoting
positive incentive measures in the agriculture sector for conservation
of biodiversity and ecosystem services can have positive effects
if implemented in the right way
- A
massive amount of food produced for human consumption is lost or
wasted at some point along the production and consumption chain,
and this needs to be addressed
- Agricultural
extension services have been significantly reduced in recent decades,
but where they exist they can play a significant role in fostering
innovation and changes in practice
- It
is feasible to move away from intensive and industrial agricultural
practices to make food systems more ethical and address some of
the biggest challenges faced by the global community
- Knowledge,
advice and innovation is necessary for helping farmers, as a group
and as individuals, to increase productivity while decreasing their
impact on the environment
OUTLOOK
2030: The globally adopted framework for action set out in the
SDGs provides a major opportunity for driving and achieving changes
in practice. Governments are already working to address theSDGs, and
they are similarly fundamental to the work of intergovernmental organizations.
Building on this, there are significant opportunities to increase
the engagement of the private sector and civil society. With commitment
this will lead to increased understanding of the interlinkages among
sectors, and recognition of the need for policy coherence in order
to ensure that these interlinkages are properly addressed.
- Global
agreement on the SDGs was a tremendous success, and provides an
excellent basis from which to work
- There
is opportunity to harness the power of the market towards achievement
of the SDGs and Aichi Biodiversity Targets through public-private
dialogue and collaboration
- There
is a common interest in making the relationship between agriculture
and biodiversity work, but this will also require policy coherence
between the different sectors
- The
existing landscape of intergovernmental bodies is well placed to
support the transformative changes needed to achieve all of the
SDGs
- It
is important to act now, and to increase the momentum of moving
from talking to action
- A
key action is taking the issues up further at the CBD Conference
of the Parties and its High Level Segment, but this is not the only
forum and outreach will be extended further.
References
for the statistics on the first page:
- UN
(2015), UN projects world population to reach 8.5 billion by 2030,
driven by growth in developing countries. www.un.org/sustaina
bledevelopment/blog/2015/07/un-projects-world-population-to-reach-8-5-billion-by-2030-driven-by-growth-in-developing-countries/
- Searchinger,
T, C. Hanson, J. Ranganathan, B. Lipinski, R. Waite, R. Winterbottom,
A. Dinshaw and R. Heimlich (2013), Creating a Sustainable Food Future
- A menu of solutions to sustainably feed more than 9 billion people
by 2050, World Resources Report 2013–14: Interim Findings. https://www.wri.org/sites/default/files/wri13_report_4c_wrr_online.pdf
- FAO,
IFAD and WFP. 2015. The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2015.
Meeting the 2015 international hunger targets: taking stock of uneven
progress. Rome. www.fao.org/3/a-i4646e/index.html
- Calculated
from FAO Food balance sheets
- FAO
Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (2016),
Monitoring the implementation of the Second Global Plan of Action
and preparing The Third Report on the State of the World’s Plant
Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (CGRFA/WG-PGR-8/16/4).
www.fao.org/3/a-mq723e.pdf
- Casta๑eda-มlvarez,
Nora P, Colin K Khoury, Harold A Achicanoy, Vician Bernau, Hannes
Dempewolf, Ruth J Eastwood, Luigi Guarino, et al. (2016), Global
Conservation Priotities for Crop Wild Relatives. Nature Plants
2 (March 21): 16022. dx.doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2016.22
- FAO
(2015), The Second Report on the State of the World’s Animal Genetic
Resources for Food and Agriculture, edited by B.D. Scherf &
D. Pilling. FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture.
Rome. www.fao.org/3/a-i4787e/index.html
- FAO
(2014), The State of Food and Agriculture: Innovation in family
farming. www.fao.org/3/a-i4036e.pdf
- FAO
(2013), FAO Statistical Yearbook 2013 World Food and Agriculture.
www.fao.org/docrep/018/i3107e/i3107e.PDF
- Secretariat
of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2014) Global Biodiversity
Outlook 4. Montr้al.
- FAO
and ITPS (2015), Status of the World’s Soil Resources (SWSR) – Main
Report. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
and Intergovernmental Technical Panel on Soils, Rome. www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/c6814873-efc3-41db-b7d3-2081a10ede50/
- FAO
(2011), Global food losses and food waste – extent, causes and prevention.
www.fao.org/save-food/resources/keyfindings/en/
- According
to the IPCC (2014), the Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use
(AFOLU) sector is responsible for just under a quarter of anthropogenic
greenhouse gas emissions mainly from deforestation and agricultural
emissions from livestock, soil and nutrient management. See Chapter
11 of the Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth IPCC Assessment
Report. www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg3/ipcc_wg3_ar5_chapter11.pdf
THE
TRONDHEIM CONFERENCE
Since 1993, the
Trondheim Conferences on Biodiversity have provided a valuable
forum for dialogue amongst stakeholders on key issues relating
to implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity
(CBD). Recognising the importance of mainstreaming biodiversity
considerations across government and society, the eighth Trondheim
Conference focused on the interlinkages between agriculture
and biodiversity, the roles that biodiversity and ecosystem
services play in “food systems for a sustainable future”, and
the opportunities provided by an increased understanding of
the interactions. Some 300 participants from around 95 countries,
deliberately chosen from both the biodiversity and agriculture
sectors, considered the ways in which biodiversity and ecosystem
services contribute to food production and future food security,
and the ways in which a careful alignment and mix of policies,
incentives and practical approaches can help deliver development
pathways that lead to a more s ustainable society. The Government
of Norway hosted the Conference in cooperation with the CBD-secretariat,
FAO, UNDP, UNEP, UNESCO, the GEF Secretariat and the World Bank.
These summary findings are extracted from the summary report
prepared by the Conference co-chairs.
|