Mainstreaming
Agroecology Requires Fundamental Shift
In
spite of growing evidence that agroecology can ensure healthy and
sustainable food and ecological systems, its promotion in policy and
extension remains limited. A paper by the International Institute
for Environment and Development (IIED) examines the reasons for this
situation, analyses the benefits and challenges, and discusses what
needs to be done to mainstream agroecology more widely in agricultural
policy and practice so that it can support the achievement ofsustainable
livelihoods, food sovereignty and climate resilience.
The
paper concludes that “as agroecological practices seek to optimise,
rather than maximise, production (and profits), mainstreaming agroecology
requires a fundamental cultural and philosophical shift – not just
by farmers but by society as a whole – in what we mean by productive
and efficient”.
The
summary of the paper and a table from it (Table 2) listing the challenges
to the adoption of agroecology and what policy options are needed
to overcome these are reproduced below.
With
best wishes
Third
World Network
131
Jalan Macalister
10400
Penang
Malaysia
Email:
twnet@po.jaring.my
Website:
http://www.biosafety-info.net/and
http://www.twn.my/
To
subscribe to other TWN information services: www.twnnews.net
AGROECOLOGY
What
It Is And What It Has To Offer
Laura
Silici
International
Institute for Environment and Development (IIED)
http://pubs.iied.org/14629IIED.html
Summary
Agroecological
farming is coming of age. Once the exclusive domain of food sovereignty
and ecology movements, it has begun to be promoted enthusiastically
in both developed and developing countries by non-government organisations,
international development organisations and others seeking more sustainable
food production and consumption systems. Though difficult to quantify,
a growing body of anecdotal evidence and small-scale studies highlights
the environmental and social benefits that these practices can bring.
For example, a review of 40 initiatives employing different agroecological
practices showed an average crop yield increase of 113%, in addition
to environmental benefits such as carbon sequestration, reduction
in pesticide use and soil restoration. Yet despite the fact that agroecological
practices can bring resilience and broad-based productivity to rural
communities and provide important ecosystem services across the landscape,
they are still not being widely promoted in agricultural policies
or by agricultural research organisations in developed nor developing
countries, nor scaled-up at a significant level. This paper asks why,
tracing the multiple interpretations of agroecology: what it means
to different people and how it is used. It lists the benefits and
challenges of agroecological practices and how they compare with input-intensive,
large-scale farming. Finally, it asks what more needs to be done to
mainstream agroecology more widely in agricultural policies and practices?
Table
2. Mainstreaming agroecology: Challenges and policy options
CHALLENGES
|
POLICY OPTIONS
|
Agroecological practices
are locally-specific and knowledge and management-intensive:
• Adoption requires
access to skills and information, strengthening of local knowledge,
incremental learning and links to social networks
• Extension advice
should be context-specific and creative and respond to farmer
demand rather than imposing standard solutions
|
Ensure that research
priorities and funding are re-directed to strengthen research
on agroecology and incorporate ecological principles into agricultural
science curricula and research.
Pursue a new approach
to generating and disseminating knowledge – a shift is needed
from top- down research and extension to bottom-up approaches
and local innovation:
• The identification
of the problems should be an integral part of research, development
and implementation and be achieved through participatory processes
that involve farmers and local communities
• Scientific research
should incorporate local practices and indigenous traditional
knowledge • Extension services should be decentralised
• Farmer-to-farmer
exchanges and grassroots extension methods should be facilitated
|
Thinking in systems
and systemic changerequires a holistic understanding
of competing objectives
|
Agricultural research
should follow an interdisciplinary approach that integrates
ecology, natural resource management, socio-economic and cultural
aspects
|
Market failures:
• Agricultural subsidies
and protectionist trade policies keep the costs of unsustainable
production models low
• The positive externalities
of agroecology are not recognised in the prices farmers receive,
whereas the environmental costs of ‘conventional’ practices
are paid for by the state and taxpayers
• Non-commodity outputs
(such as environmental services) of farming are not recognised
or are under-produced because their market price is distorted
or non-existent
|
Re-orient national
and international trade policies:
• End subsidies to
agriculture in industrialised countries and manage supply to
ensure that public support does not lead to over-production
and dumping
• Agree on the valuation
and incorporation of externalities in national and international
markets, especially in view of trade liberalisation
Re-orient agricultural
and rural development policies:
• Value multi-functionality
of agriculture and farmers’ roles in the stewardship of ecosystem
by providing appropriate incentives and creating markets for
ecosystem services (including landscape conservation)
|
Lack of access to
natural resources and insecure land tenure discouragepractices
that require investment in assets and knowledge and co- operative
behaviours, such as agroforestry and soil conservation schemes
|
Re-orient/introduce
policies to support small-scale farming:
• Secure equitable
rights of access and use for land, water, forests, common property
resources and seeds
• Encourage the formation
of farmers’ groups and co- operatives
|
The strong influence
of vertically integrated and highly concentrated agri-business
corporations on agricultural research and food policieslimits
small-scale farmers’ capacity to link independently with markets
and access demand-led research and extension
|
Provide adequate incentives
and technical assistance to support small-farmers and small
and medium sized enterprises in the creation of local ‘agroecological
business models’ that can make appropriate inputs and technologies
available in the market
|
Erosion of traditional
cultural values and institutions and traditional knowledge (TK)
|
Promote policies that
strengthen indigenous cultures and local organisations and protect
the knowledge and rights of farmers and pastoralists to
save and improve seeds and share benefits from the use of traditional
crop and livestock varieties
|