|
||
|
||
Caught in the food pirates' trap In this critique of the food and agrarian policies pursued by the current Indian administration, Devinder Sharma laments its failure to draw the lessons from the social unrest in recent years caused by the debacle of similar development models elsewhere. ON 17 December, Mohammed
Bouazizi, a 24-year-old vegetable seller in The tremors have still
not died down in the rest of the The revolt in the Arab world is the outcome of a mix of combustibles. But high unemployment and rising food prices have surely added fuel to the fire. Low investment in education, job creation and domestic food production had rendered these countries ruled by long-serving corrupt and dictatorial regimes highly vulnerable to political turmoil. With food prices spiralling in the past few months and with lack of employment opportunities, the bubble went bust. Political tsunami Unlike the 2008 global
food crisis, when 37 countries faced food riots, ousting the Haitian
president in the process, spiralling fuel and food prices, especially
since September 2010, have been even more piercing this time, resulting
in a strong political tsunami. It all began when Deadly food riots
were witnessed in September in As early as in September,
the Financial Times had reported that wheat futures had taken advantage,
and that wheat prices internationally had gone up by 70% since January
2010. This happened at a time when there was neither a shortfall in
production nor any appreciable rise in demand. Grave crisis
The social and political unrest that has swept the Arab hinterland is a pointer to a grave crisis ahead. Although Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the head of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), agrees that the rising food and fuel prices in recent months are the major factors behind the massive anti-government protests, he suggests more of the same prescription: 'As tensions between countries increase, we could see rising protectionism - of trade and of finance.' Not drawing any lesson from the debacle of the dominant economic model of growth, business leaders from 17 private companies announced at the World Economic Forum at Davos in the last week of January the launch of a global initiative - New Vision for Agriculture - that sets ambitious targets for increasing food production by 20%, decreasing greenhouse gas emissions per ton by 20%, and reducing rural poverty by 20% every decade. The 17 agribusiness giants include Archer Daniels Midland, BASF, Bunge Ltd, Cargill, Coca-Cola, DuPont, General Mills, Kraft Foods, Metro AG, Monsanto, Nestl‚, PepsiCo, SABMiller, Syngenta, Unilever, Wal-Mart and Yara International. All such initiatives are, of course, backed by the US Agency for International Development (USAID), the main driving force for promoting an industrial takeover of global agriculture. 'We are witnessing an unparalleled opportunity right now for innovative, large-scale private sector partnerships to achieve significant impact on global hunger and nutrition,' USAID Administrator Rajiv Shah said at Davos. 'USAID is committed to creating new public-private partnerships in Feed the Future focus countries to advance their national investment plans.' Well, this shouldn't come as a surprise. Every global crisis provides an opportunity for business. Multinational giants are quick to grab it. In the days to come, I am sure political leaderships across the world, with USAID backing, will welcome the initiative, not realising that it is the industrial farming model that has created the global food crisis in the first instance - soil health has been devastated, excessive mining of groundwater has dried aquifers and chemical pesticides have contaminated the food chain. The Green Revolution
has already run out of steam, leaving behind a trail of misery and terrible
human suffering. Over the years, an unjust world trade system has pushed
farmers out of agriculture. In the past 30 years or so, including the
years since the establishment of the World Trade Organisation, 105 of
the 149 No place for farmers How is this related to Indian agriculture? Well, let me begin with the latest pronouncements first. Economist Raghuram Rajan, a professor of finance at the Chicago Booth School of Business, and an honorary economic adviser to the Indian prime minister, said the other day: 'Thinking that India will remain a country where more than 60% of people will remain in agriculture is just a pipe dream. The people dependent on agriculture should be brought down to 5% over the years.' This is in tune with what Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has been asking for a number of years now. At least 70% of farmers need to be moved out of agriculture. Read this in consonance
with what Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia
says. He has invited Omani firms to farm in It doesn't stop here. The Planning Commission, economists, scientists and bureaucrats are now clamouring for free markets - commodity exchange, futures trading and food retail - as the way to turn farming economically viable. Coupled with land rental policies that have promoted a surge in land acquisitions, setting up of special economic zones, and the promotion of contract farming and commodity trading, India is now getting ready to hand over agriculture to private companies. Farmers have therefore become a burden on society, and the government is in a raging hurry to offload the burden. This is being facilitated by tailoring domestic laws on seeds, fertilisers, pesticides, mandis, biodiversity, biotechnology, water and land acquisition to the needs of industry. Let us be very clear: the second Green Revolution has no place for farmers. What is worrying is
that instead of drawing any lesson from the debacle of the first Green
Revolution, the government is on a fast track to usher in the second
Green Revolution, which will only compound the existing agrarian crisis.
This is being backed by an Indo-US Initiative in Agriculture Research,
Education and Marketing (KIA), an agreement signed with the Bush administration
in 2005, and which is expected to be renewed with the Obama administration.
This reminds me of
what the World Bank had forewarned way back in 1996. By the end of 2020,
the Bank estimated, 400 million people - close to double the combined
population of the Prime Minister Manmohan
Singh has already laid the ground rules for a population shift. The
biggest environmental displacement the world will witness will therefore
be in agriculture. Ironically, barely 44 years after Mrs Indira Gandhi
launched the Wheat Revolution (which later was re-christened the Green
Revolution) that pulled Food self-sufficiency A high-growth trajectory
and rising incomes do not provide any security against social unrest.
Let us not forget I thought Manmohan
Singh would heed the warning that was sounded by Jawaharlal Nehru just
five years after Simultaneous to major
economies, including India, removing all the protectionist measures
to allow free trade in agriculture, rich countries have already moved
in to grab fertile land in the developing world. These 'food pirates'
come with a bag full of foreign direct investment and are moving swiftly
where land is available, investing in crops that can be shipped back
home. Already an area which exceeds the size of We are, therefore, entering a phase when even if you have money food will not be available in the international market. This is primarily the reason why companies from rich countries have invested in developing countries to meet the domestic requirement back home. Add to this the fact that food is now being branded as a hot commodity, which the futures market will continue to exploit. Unregulated commodity trading has already multiplied from a mere $0.77 trillion in 2002 to over $7 trillion in 2007. While people die from
hunger or storm into the cities expressing anger against the political
leadership (not knowing that the real culprit is Wall Street), the investment
banks and hedge funds quietly make a killing from speculation. With
the major economies, the IMF and the World Bank turning a blind eye
to food speculation, Hosni Mubarak may not be the last political head
to roll. If only Devinder Sharma
is a leading food and trade policy analyst based in *Third World Resurgence No. 247, March 2011, pp 16-18 |
||
|