|
|
||
|
TWN Info Service on Intellectual Property Issues (Mar07/04) 14 March 2007
Dr. Idris is only the second man to serve as WIPO’s director general since it became a U.N. agency, and he has earned a reputation for ruling in a vice-regal style. According to the UN auditor’s report Dr. Idris’s may have edged out better qualified competitors by presenting himself as born in 1945, and therefore being 37 years old. This implied a degree of experience he could not then have had, if he was actually born in 1954, and aged 28. Similarly, the report questions whether Idris could have climbed the WIPO ladder as quickly as he did had he not adopted a phony age. The report also states that now that Idris is officially nine years younger, if he leaves the UN in 2009 or possibly before, might under some circumstances qualify for a “termination indemnity” of up to 18 months’ salary, which he would not receive if born in 1945. This report is the result of an investigation requested last year by another U.N. oversight arm, the Joint Inspection Unit (JIU), after stories appeared in the Swiss press when Idris began amending his birthdate last spring in his U.N. personnel files, in Swiss property records, and on his Swiss diplomatic card. Below is a story from Foxnews on this matter. The Auditor’s report is also available at http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/Idris.pdf Best
Wishes One for the Ages: U.N. Official Uses Two Birthdates By Claudia Rosett, Tuesday, February 27, 2007 The
phrase “born again” is taking on a whole new meaning in a scandal now
brewing at a little-known but important United Nations agency based
in That
would be bizarre in any context, but it is an alarming discovery at
the World Intellectual Property Organization, or WIPO, a U.N. agency
with an annual budget of more than $200 million that is supposed to
be one of the world’s great bastions of accurate record-keeping. Based
in Nor
is this the only scandal to entangle WIPO and Kamil Idris, a citizen
of Yet
more questions were raised about Idris’ purchase of a villa on the edge
of Through it all, Idris has denied any wrongdoing. Idris
is not denying, however, the manipulation of his birthdate on official
WIPO documents; though he continues to insist he was not in any serious
way at fault. But a WIPO internal audit report, completed last November,
and obtained by FOX News, shows otherwise. Among other things, it alleges
that Idris for more than two decades falsified his date of birth on
a slew of official U.N. documents, including a dozen “laissez-passer”
authorizations for international travel on U.N. business – which in
many countries allow the bearer to skip customs and immigration inspection.
In all of them, Idris gave his date of birth as Aug. 26, 1945 -- even
though he now says he was actually born on Aug. 26, 1954. Idris has
also signed his name to the false birthdate of 1945 on Swiss diplomatic
permits and property records, and Idris has told U.N. investigators that the false birth-dating was due merely to a typographical error made back in 1982, when he first applied for a job a WIPO – where he has worked and risen through the ranks since 1983. Idris also said that for years he had continued to use the false birthdate on some official documents for “consistency.” But
according to the audit report, Idris was anything but consistent. At
the same times he was signing his name to U.N. “laissez-passer” travel
documents and Idris did not reply to repeated queries from FOX News. But a WIPO spokeswoman e-mailed a press communiqué saying that it was Idris himself who initiated a correction in official records last year, and that Idris would not benefit from the change. The statement said he would in fact lose some of his pension benefits as a result of shedding nine years from his official age. The statement added that all allegations that Idris sought to profit from the error are “groundless” and “racist.” But
the WIPO internal report, signed by WIPO’s senior internal auditor,
Marco Pautasso, tells a different story. Based on interviews, internal
WIPO documents and other documentation from places in Idris’ past, ranging
from This report is the result of an investigation requested last year by another U.N. oversight arm, the Joint Inspection Unit (JIU), after stories appeared in the Swiss press when Idris began amending his birthdate last spring in his U.N. personnel files, in Swiss property records, and on his Swiss diplomatic card . There was speculation at the time -- also dismissed by Idris’ office -- that Idris might stand to gain from the change, The JIU asked Pautasso to investigate in order “to put the issues to rest one way or the other.” The
basic storyline of Idris’ career, which can be distilled from the audit
report, is simple enough. Idris was born in In 1982 he applied for a job with WIPO, and he joined the WIPO staff the following year. He has been at the organization ever since, reaching the top job of director general in 1997. He won a second six-year term of office in 2003. The
bottom line on the dual birthdates appears to be that for WIPO and related
business, such as travel to the Pautasso’s report sums up, demurely, that the information in Idris’ records of education and employment is “sometimes contradictory.” And sometimes stranger than that. The audit report notes that Idris’ 1982 WIPO job application claimed that from 1967-1970 he had held full- and part-time posts “at the national level” in Sudan. The report notes dryly that “if born in 1954, Mr. Idris was aged 13 to 16 when he filled these posts.” It
also appears that while attending The report also takes issue with any claim that Idris did not benefit from the change in his age. Based on WIPO internal records, it alleges that Idris in his initial application to work at WIPO may have edged out better qualified competitors by presenting himself as born in 1945, and therefore being 37 years old. This implied a degree of experience he could not then have had, if he was actually born in 1954, and aged 28. Similarly, the report questions whether Idris could have climbed the WIPO ladder as quickly as he did had he not adopted a phony age. The report further alleges that Idris’ recent change of birthdate in U.N. records could under some scenarios allow him to benefit “considerably” in financial terms. Idris’ contract as director general expires in 2009. In the context of his 1945 birthdate, that expiration would have come well after he had reached the usual WIPO retirement age of 60. But now that Idris is officially nine years younger, he has more room to maneuver. Pautasso outlines, for example, how the suddenly younger Idris, if he leaves the UN in 2009 or possibly before, might under some circumstances qualify for a “termination indemnity” of up to 18 months’ salary, which he would not receive if born in 1945. There are further oddities, but the allegations in the report from WIPO’s own internal auditor point to problems at WIPO that appear to go much deeper than simply a director-general who for decades has been using two -- or maybe three -- different birthdates, and might have turned the confusion to personal gain. The
big question is how Idris’s shifting identity went uncorrected -- and
uninvestigated -- for so long. That question of too-little inspection,
carried out too late, has dogged all U.N. scandals in recent years,
from Oil For Food to the recent issues of United Nations Development
Program funding in Claudia Rosett is a journalist-in-residence at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,255098,00.html
|
||