|
||
TWN Info Service on Finance and Development (Jun07/03) 27 June 2007
The world’s leading economies, and in particular the deficit countries, need to increase interest rates in order to avoid the twin risks of rising inflation and global trade imbalances, the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), has suggested. In its annual report (April 2006 - March 2007) released Sunday, the BIS also advocated policies in surplus countries, in particular Japan and China, that would lead to the Japanese yen appreciating, as also for the Chinese renminbi to appreciate, even as the BIS recognised the problems it may create for China. The BIS report noted that global growth was strong along with subdued inflation – broad-based growth upswing in the industrial countries, continued rapid growth in emerging market economies, and with poorer countries too sharing in the growth. And the consensus forecast for 2007 and 2008 point to a continuation of these recent developments. Real growth in the global economy, the BIS notes, has been maintained around levels that are among the highest recorded in the post-war period, and a welcome feature of this is that the world’s poorest countries have shared in this growing prosperity. In spite of this rapid growth, and significant upward shocks to commodity prices, underlying inflation levels have remained subdued. Real interest rates and risk premia of all sorts have remained uncharacteristically low. Record global trade imbalances have thus far been easily financed. And exchange rates have remained generally quite stable. Below is a report of the BIS’ forecast of the global economy by Chakravarthi Raghavan, Editor Emeritus of the South-North Development Monitor (SUNS). It was published in SUNS #6279 Tuesday 26 June 2007. With
best wishes BIS Advocates Rise in Interest Rates in Leading Deficit Countries By Chakravarthi Raghavan The world’s leading economies, and in particular the deficit countries, need to increase interest rates in order to avoid the twin risks of rising inflation and global trade imbalances, Mr. Malcolm Knight, the General Manager of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), has suggested. The
Basle-based BIS, the central bank for the central banks of the world,
is holding its annual meeting Monday at Basle, and preceding that over
the weekend has been holding meetings with some 200-odd central bankers
of the world. Knight spoke to the media Sunday at In its annual report (April 2006 - March 2007) released Sunday, the BIS also advocated policies in surplus countries, in particular Japan and China, that would lead to the Japanese yen appreciating, as also for the Chinese renminbi to appreciate, even as the BIS recognised the problems it may create for China. The BIS report noted that global growth was strong along with subdued inflation – broad-based growth upswing in the industrial countries, continued rapid growth in emerging market economies, and with poorer countries too sharing in the growth. And the consensus forecast for 2007 and 2008 point to a continuation of these recent developments. In fact, the performance of the global economy over the last few years has been “extraordinary”, and the consensus forecasts of its likely continuance is such that it has the BIS and other central bankers worried over the uncertainties of downside risks and a combination of them acting together, “in a fundamentally uncertain world, in which probabilities cannot be calculated, – rather than simply a risky one.” Real growth in the global economy, the BIS notes, has been maintained around levels that are among the highest recorded in the post-war period, and a welcome feature of this is that the world’s poorest countries have shared in this growing prosperity. In spite of this rapid growth, and significant upward shocks to commodity prices, underlying inflation levels have remained subdued. Real interest rates and risk premia of all sorts have remained uncharacteristically low. Record global trade imbalances have thus far been easily financed. And exchange rates have remained generally quite stable. In isolation, each of these outcomes might be welcomed without further reflection. “However,” says the BIS, “the combination of developments is so extraordinary that it must raise questions about the source and, closely related, the sustainability of all this good fortune.” “Economics is not a science, at least not in the sense that repeated experiments always produce the same results,” the report underlines in a sober opening to its concluding chapter. “Thus, economic forecasts are often widely off the mark, particularly at cyclical turning points, with inadequate data, deficient models and random shocks often conspiring to produce unsatisfactory outcomes. Even trickier is the task of assigning probabilities to the risks surrounding forecasts. Indeed, this is so difficult that it is scarcely an exaggeration to say that we face a fundamentally uncertain world - one in which probabilities cannot be calculated - rather than simply a risky one.” Referring
to economic history, and past events where commentators and analysts
of the time were taken by surprise, the report cites the great inflation
of the 1970s, and the subsequent disinflation and economic recovery,
the great depression of the Indeed, in the light of massive and ongoing structural changes, it is not hard to argue that our understanding of economic processes may even be less today than it was in the past. Among other things, the report cautions policy-makers against dangerous financial innovation, especially distribution of credit risks through asset-based securities. On the real side of the economy, a combination of technological progress and globalisation has revolutionised production. On the financial side, new players, new instruments and new attitudes have proven equally revolutionary. And on the monetary side, increasingly independent central banks have changed dramatically in terms of both how they act and how they communicate with the public. In the midst of all this change, no one could seriously contend that it is business as usual? There is, moreover, a special uncertainty in the area of monetary policy – where central bankers in the pursuit of price stability are divided on the role of money and credit in the conduct of monetary policy. Against this background, neither central banks nor the markets are likely to be infallible in their judgments. The implication for markets is that they must continue to do their own independent thinking. Simply looking into the mirror of the central banks’ convictions could well prove a dangerous strategy. The implication for policymakers is that they should continue to work on improving the resilience of the system to inevitable but unexpected shocks. The consensus forecast for the global economy is that recent high levels of growth will continue, that global inflation will stay quite subdued, and that global current account imbalances will gradually moderate. As for financial markets, the consensus forecast for 2007 is that long rates will stay around current levels. Evidently, and appropriately, this forecast implicitly assumes that there will be no major geopolitical disruptions and no disturbances in the financial sector significant enough to affect the real economy. As a near-term proposition, a forecast that says the future will be a lot like the past has much to recommend it. Looking closely at forecast errors in recent years, one might conclude that there are grounds for even greater optimism. Real growth has, on the whole, been stronger than expected, while inflation has generally stayed in line with predictions, despite sharp increases in commodity prices in the last year or so. Long-term interest rates have also consistently come in below anticipated levels. Since it is well known that forecast errors often display a significant degree of persistence, one might with some confidence expect the good news to continue. Only with respect to global trade imbalances have the actual out-turns been markedly worse than expected, but even here, there are some signs of improvement. Yet it is not difficult to identify uncertainties that could conceivably cause this near-term forecast to come unstuck, or that could result in less welcome outcomes over a longer horizon. The report while analysing separately the various areas of concern, cautions that they could well be interdependent - with the accommodative financial conditions as the causal thread linking these areas of concern together. A
first uncertainty has to do with the possible resurgence of global inflation
and, potentially, inflation expectations. Estimates of capacity gaps
in most of the major industrial countries indicate that they are approaching
or have reached the limits of their potential. Disinflation pressures
originating in emerging market economies also seem to be easing in the
wake of sometimes extraordinary domestic growth rates. In In
the Viewed
in this light, the recent slowing in the While
the attention of financial markets focused on the The
concern is that this might all reverse. Debt service levels are already
elevated and mortgage rates might rise further. House prices only need
to stop rising (indeed, this may already have happened) to slow both
the recourse to credit and the sense of confidence arising from increases
in wealth. Moreover, when cuts in construction jobs begin to match the
much larger fall in housing starts to date, then wage income, job security
and confidence could be further affected. Were corporate fixed investment,
already inexplicably weak given high profits and low financing costs,
to retreat as well, then the stage might be set for a more significant
and perhaps unwelcome deceleration in Were
the On
the other hand, in both And,
even without a synchronised business cycle, boardroom confidence globally
might be affected by a sharp To near-term uncertainties about inflation and growth must be added a number of medium-term concerns, not least persistent and substantial global trade imbalances. Is this a problem, requiring a policy response to lower the possibility of large and perhaps abrupt movements in exchange rates? Or, is one to assume that the capital inflows needed to finance such deficits will be available on not significantly different terms for the foreseeable future? Countries with large trade deficits are generally those where domestic demand has been growing relatively fast, and where interest rates are relatively high in consequence. In principle, such countries should also have depreciating currencies. This would allow external deficits to be reduced over time as domestic demand began to ease under the influence of higher rates. Unfortunately,
in practice, relatively high interest rates often induce private capital
inflows of such a magnitude as to cause the exchange rate to appreciate
rather than depreciate, and to raise domestic asset prices, which leads
to more spending rather than less. Both these developments will cause
the trade deficit to worsen further. This process was very much part
of the story in the The
The
reliability of public sector inflows has also become more uncertain,
for at least two reasons. First, countries outside the A final set of medium-term uncertainties has to do with potential vulnerabilities in financial markets and possible knock-on effects on financial institutions. The prices of virtually all assets have been trending upwards, almost without interruption, since the middle of 2003. While there are various explanations, the BIS warns that the market reaction to good news might have become irrationally exuberant. One manifestation of this has been that the intermittent periods of financial volatility have become progressively shorter, and this has encouraged the view that lower prices constitute a buying opportunity. The danger with such endogenous market processes is that they can, indeed must, eventually go into reverse if the fundamentals have been overpriced. Moreover, should liquidity dry up and correlations among asset prices rise, the concern would be that prices might also overshoot on the downside. Such cycles have been seen many times in the past. While big investment and commercial banks seem very well capitalised, and many have been making record profits, with unprecedented attention to risk management issues, there are also sources of concern: the spreads on credit default swaps for some of the best known names have recently been elevated in comparison to the levels that would be normal given their credit ratings. One area of concern is market risk and leverage. Balance sheets have grown significantly. Moreover, value-at-risk measures have stayed constant even though measured volatility has fallen substantially. Another possible worry, linked to the “originate and distribute” strategy, is that originators might be stuck with a warehouse of depreciating assets in turbulent times. The fact that banks are now increasingly providing bridge equity, along with bridge loans, to support the still growing number of corporate mergers and acquisitions, is not a good sign. A closely related concern is the possibility that banks have, either intentionally or inadvertently, retained a significant degree of credit risk on their books. The risk is embodied in various forms of asset-backed securities of growing complexity and opacity - purchased by a wide range of smaller banks, pension funds, insurance companies, hedge funds, other funds and even individuals, who have been encouraged to invest by the generally high ratings given to these instruments. Unfortunately, the ratings reflect only expected credit losses, and not the unusually high probability of tail events that could have large effects on market values. Hedge funds might be most exposed, since many have tended to specialise in purchases of the riskiest sorts of these instruments, and their inherent leverage can in consequence be very high. By definition, it is not possible to put all these uncertainties together and arrive at a prediction. Behind each set of concerns lurks the common factor of the highly accommodating financial conditions. All this should serve to remind policy-makers that tail events affecting the global economy might at some point have much higher costs than is commonly supposed. In
terms of policy response, however, today’s evident good times must be
used to prepare for a less certain future. In terms of fiscal policy,
the BIS chief advocates policies aimed at further facilitating the shift
of resources between tradable and non-tradable sectors in both surplus
and deficit countries. Such a shift into non-tradable sectors is essential
in countries with large trade surpluses - in particular However,
in all these countries, allocation of resources at the moment is taking
place in the wrong direction. In The implication is that the price signals provided by exchange movements need to be significantly greater than otherwise. In terms of the financial sector, it might be undesirable, even if it were possible, to rollback changes that have occurred over the last few years in the advanced industrial countries. Nevertheless, there must be scepticism about purported benefits of new players, new instruments and new business models, in particular, the “originate and distribute” approach. And in emerging markets, “liberalisation needs to be preceded by structural changes that will allow financial systems to remain resilient in the face of both domestic and external shocks.” While much progress has been made, “much more is still needed.” Though the BIS has not spelt this last out, it is a cautionary signal against the drive for liberalisation of financial markets and services being pushed at the IMF, by the new World Bank President designate, and in the financial services talks at the WTO. As for central banks and supervisory authorities, in terms of monetary policy, BIS advocates gradual normalisation of level of policy rates - to contain any inflationary risks and collaterally help lean against any buildup of vulnerabilities in financial markets associated with underpricing of risks. The BIS argues that in general, large economies with floating exchange rates should continue to let them float freely; there is clearly something anomalous in the ongoing decline in the external value of the yen. Tighter monetary policies would help to redress this situation, but the underlying problem seems to be a too firm conviction on the part of investors that the yen will not be allowed to strengthen in any significant way. There should also be a greater willingness to let the renminbi rise, even though one recognises the formidable internal challenges this will pose to the Chinese authorities. Such a move would also allow other Asian currencies to move up further against the US dollar, again contributing to a reduction in global trade imbalances. While
some in In the area of prudential policy, authorities should redouble efforts to strengthen financial infrastructure - such as recent actions to improve confirmation and settlement of credit derivatives, strengthening of domestic capital markets in emerging markets, encourage prudential behaviour through supervisory review processes, and strengthening the macro-prudential orientation of regulatory and supervisory frameworks, as well as continuance of quiet efforts to improve mechanisms for addressing potential financial distress if it were to emerge. And an increasingly globalized world puts a premium on close dialogue and cooperation among national authorities. * Chakravarthi Raghavan is Editor Emeritus of the South-North Development Monitor (SUNS).
|