|
||
TWN
Info Service on Climate Change (May23/07) Equity assessment of global mitigation pathways in the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report The Working Group III contribution to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)’s Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) has based its analysis of global mitigation pathways on a select subset of 1,202 scenarios out of the 2,425 scenarios submitted to it. The IPCC authors decided the vetting/selection criteria and hence the assessed scenarios are not representative of the literature. Adherence to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) principles of equity and common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities (CBDR&RC) was not part of these criteria. A
new Briefing Paper published by the Third World Network presents the
results of an equity assessment carried out for all the scenarios
that use a 10-region classification and correspond to the temperature
goals of the Paris Agreement and which were part of the IPCC WGIII
assessment. The key overall finding is that all scenarios project
a highly unequal future world that perpetuates most inequalities.
Growth and development, and energy use, are restricted for developing
countries, and not just fossil fuel consumption. Other significant
findings include: The findings show that the scenarios do not take any account of equity and CBDR&RC, and project the perpetuation of global inequalities in a number of economic, energy and emission variables. Developing countries are therefore well-advised not to use the scenarios and global mitigation pathways of AR6 as the benchmark or reference for negotiations due to the highly unequal regional outcomes underlying the global targets on which these scenarios are based. The
TWN Briefing Paper, “Equity assessment of global mitigation pathways
in the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report”, is available at https://twn.my/title2/briefing_papers/twn/Equity%20assessment With
best wishes,
|