BACK TO MAIN  |  ONLINE BOOKSTORE  |  HOW TO ORDER

Blood money

The driving force behind the US invasion of Iraq is the Project for the New American Century, a group which seeks to transform America into a planetary empire by force of arms. William Rivers Pitt unmasks the personalities and the corporations behind this group.

William Rivers Pitt

THE Project for the New American Century, or PNAC, is a group founded in 1997 that has been agitating since its inception for a war with Iraq. PNAC was the driving force behind the drafting and passage of the Iraqi Liberation Act, a bill that painted a veneer of legality over the ultimate designs behind such a conflict. The names of every prominent PNAC member were on a letter delivered to President Clinton in 1998 which castigated him for not implementing the Act by driving troops into Baghdad.

PNAC has funnelled millions of taxpayer dollars to a Hussein opposition group called the Iraqi National Congress, and to Iraq’s heir-apparent, Ahmed Chalabi, despite the fact that Chalabi was sentenced in absentia by a Jordanian court to 22 years in prison on 31 counts of bank fraud. Chalabi and the INC have, over the years, gathered support for their cause by promising oil contracts to anyone that would help to put them in power in Iraq.

Most recently, PNAC created a new group called the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq. Staffed entirely by PNAC members, the Committee has set out to ‘educate’ Americans via cable news connections about the need for war in Iraq. This group met recently with National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice regarding the ways and means of this education.

Who is PNAC? Its members include:

·        Vice President Dick Cheney, one of the PNAC founders, who served as Secretary of Defence for Bush Sr.;

·        I Lewis Libby, Cheney’s top national security assistant;

·        Secretary of Defence Donald Rumsfeld, also a founding member, along with four of his chief aides including:

·        Deputy Secretary of Defence Paul Wolfowitz, arguably the ideological father of the group;

·        Eliot Abrams, prominent member of Bush’s National Security Council, who was pardoned by Bush Sr. in the Iran/Contra scandal;

·        John Bolton, who serves as Undersecretary for Arms Control and International Security in the Bush administration;

·        Richard Perle, former Reagan administration official and present chairman of the powerful Defence Policy Board;

·        Randy Scheunemann, President of the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq, who was Trent Lott’s national security aide and who served as an adviser to Rumsfeld on Iraq in 2001;

·        Bruce Jackson, Chairman of PNAC, a position he took after serving for years as vice president of weapons manufacturer Lockheed-Martin, and who also headed the Republican Party Platform subcommittee for National Security and Foreign Policy during the 2000 campaign. His section of the 2000 GOP Platform explicitly called for the removal of Saddam Hussein;

·        William Kristol, noted conservative writer for the Weekly Standard, a magazine owned along with the Fox News Network by conservative media mogul Rupert Murdoch.

‘Pax Americana’

The Project for the New American Century seeks to establish what they call ‘Pax Americana’ across the globe. Essentially, their goal is to transform America, the sole remaining superpower, into a planetary empire by force of arms. A report released by PNAC in September of 2000 entitled ‘Rebuilding America’s Defenses’ codifies this plan, which requires a massive increase in defence spending and the fighting of several major theatre wars in order to establish American dominance. The first has been achieved in Bush’s new budget plan, which calls for the exact dollar amount to be spent on defence that was requested by PNAC in 2000. Arrangements are underway for the fighting of the wars.

The men from PNAC are in a perfect position to see their foreign policy schemes, hatched in 1997, brought into reality. They control the White House, the Pentagon and Defence Department, by way of this the armed forces and intelligence communities, and have at their feet a Republican-dominated Congress that will rubber-stamp virtually everything on their wishlist.

The first step towards the establishment of this Pax Americana is, and has always been, the removal of Saddam Hussein and the establishment of an American protectorate in Iraq. The purpose of this is threefold: 1) To acquire control of the oilheads so as to fund the entire enterprise; 2) To fire a warning shot across the bows of every leader in the Middle East; 3) To establish in Iraq a military staging area for the eventual invasion and overthrow of several Middle Eastern regimes, including some that are allies of the United States.

Another PNAC signatory, author Norman Podhoretz, quantified this aspect of the grand plan in the September 2002 issue of his journal, Commentary. In it, Podhoretz notes that the regimes ‘that richly deserve to be overthrown and replaced are not confined to the three singled-out members of the axis of evil. At a minimum, the axis should extend to Syria and Lebanon and Libya, as well as ‘friends’ of America like the Saudi royal family and Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak, along with the Palestinian Authority, whether headed by Arafat or one of his henchmen.’ At bottom, for Podhoretz, this action is about ‘the long-overdue internal reform and modernisation of Islam’.

Weapons of mass destruction are a smokescreen. Paeans to the idea of Iraqi liberation and democratisation are cynical in their inception. At the end of the day, this is not even about oil. The drive behind this war is ideological in nature, a crusade to ‘reform’ the religion of Islam as it exists in both government and society within the Middle East. Once this is accomplished, the road to empire will be open, 10 lanes wide and steppin’ out over the line.

Business  payout

At the end of the day, however, ideology is only good for bull sessions in the boardroom and the bar. Something has to grease the skids, to make the whole thing worthwhile to those involved, and entice those outside the loop to get into the game.

Thus, the payout.

It is well known by now that Dick Cheney, before becoming Vice President, served as chairman and chief executive of the Dallas-based petroleum corporation Halliburton. During his tenure, according to oil industry executives and United Nations records, Halliburton did a brisk $73 million in business with Saddam Hussein’s Iraq. While working face-to-face with Hussein, Cheney and Halliburton were also moving into position to capitalise upon Hussein’s removal from power. In October of 1995, the same month Cheney was made CEO of Halliburton, that company announced a deal that would put it first in line should war break out in Iraq. Their job: To take control of burning oil wells, put out the fires, and prepare them for service.

Another corporation that stands to do well by a war in Iraq is Brown & Root, a subsidiary of Halliburton. Ostensibly, Brown & Root is in the construction business, and thus has won a share of the $900 million government contract for the rebuilding of post-war Iraqi bridges, roads and other basic infrastructure. This is but the tip of the financial iceberg, as the oil wells will also have to be repaired after parent-company Halliburton puts out the fires.

More ominous is Brown & Root’s stock in trade: the building of permanent American military bases. There are 12 permanent US bases in Kosovo today, all built and maintained by Brown & Root for a multi-billion-dollar profit. If anyone should wonder why the administration has not offered an exit strategy to the Iraq war plans, the presence of Brown & Root should answer them succinctly. We do not plan on exiting. In all likelihood, Brown & Root is in Iraq to build permanent bases there, from which attacks upon other Middle Eastern nations can be staged and managed.

Being at the centre of the action is nothing new for Halliburton and Brown & Root. The two companies have worked closely with governments in Algeria, Angola, Bosnia, Burma, Croatia, Haiti, Nigeria, Rwanda, and Somalia during the worst chapters in those nations’ histories. Many environmental and human rights groups claim that Cheney, Halliburton and Brown & Root were, in fact, centrally involved in these fiascos. More recently, Brown & Root was contracted by the Defence Department to build cells for detainees in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The bill for that one project came to $300 million.

Cheney became involved with PNAC officially in 1997, while still profiting from deals between Halliburton and Hussein. One year later, Cheney and PNAC began actively and publicly agitating for war on Iraq. They have not stopped to this very day.

Another company with a vested interest in both war on Iraq and massively increased defence spending is the Carlyle Group. Carlyle, a private global investment firm with more than $12.5 billion in capital under management, was formed in 1987. Its interests are spread across 164 companies, including telecommunications firms and defence contractors. It is staffed at the highest levels by former members of the Reagan and Bush Sr. administrations. Former President George H W Bush is himself employed by Carlyle as a senior adviser, as is long-time Bush family adviser and former Secretary of State James Baker III.

One company acquired by Carlyle is United Defense, a weapons manufacturer based in Arlington, Virginia. United Defense provides the Defence Department with combat vehicle systems, fire support, combat support vehicle systems, weapons delivery systems, amphibious assault vehicles, combat support services and naval armaments. Specifically, United Defense manufactures the Bradley Fighting Vehicle, the M113 armoured personnel carrier, the M88A2 Recovery Vehicle, the Grizzly, the M9 ACE, the Composite Armoured Vehicle, the M6 Linebacker, the M7 BFIST, the Armoured Gun System, the M4 Command and Control Vehicle, the Battle Command Vehicle, the Paladin, the Crusader, and Electric Gun/Pulse Power weapons technology.

In other words, everything a growing Defence Department, a war in Iraq, and a burgeoning American military empire need.

Ironically, one group that won’t profit from Carlyle’s involvement in American military build-up is the family of Osama bin Laden. The bin Laden family fortune was amassed by Mohammed bin Laden, father of Osama, who built a multi-billion-dollar construction empire through contracts with the Saudi government. The Saudi BinLaden Group, as this company is called, was heavily invested in Carlyle for years. Specifically, they were invested in Carlyle’s Partners II Fund, which includes in that portfolio United Defense and other weapons manufacturers.

This relationship was described in a 27 September 2001 article in the Wall Street Journal entitled ‘Bin Laden Family Could Profit From Jump in Defense Spending Due to Ties to US Bank’. The ‘bank’ in question was the Carlyle Group. A follow-up article published by the Journal on 28 September entitled ‘ Bin Laden Family Has Intricate Ties With Washington - Saudi Clan Has Had Access To Influential Republicans’ further describes the relationship. In October of 2001, Saudi Bin Laden and Carlyle severed their relationship by mutual agreement. The timing is auspicious.

William Rivers Pitt is a New York Times bestselling author of two books - War on Iraq (with Scott Ritter) available now from Context Books, and The Greatest Sedition is Silence, available in May 2003 from Pluto Press. He teaches high school in Boston, MA. Scott Lowery contributed research to this report, the complete version of which appears on www.truthout.org.

 


BACK TO MAIN  |  ONLINE BOOKSTORE  |  HOW TO ORDER