Agribusiness is the problem, not the solution

Agribusiness advocates insist that food production must double by 2050 to feed the exponential rise of the global population to 9.7 billion and that high-yielding industrial agriculture is the only answer. Jomo Kwame Sundaram questions this claim.

FOR two centuries, all too many discussions about hunger and resource scarcity have been haunted by the ghost of Parson Thomas Malthus. Malthus warned that rising populations would exhaust resources, especially those needed for food production. Exponential population growth would outstrip food output.

Humanity now faces a major challenge as global warming is expected to frustrate the production of enough food as the world population rises to 9.7 billion by 2050. A new book by Timothy Wise, Eating Tomorrow: Agribusiness, Family Farmers, and the Battle for the Future of Food (New Press, 2019), argues that most solutions currently put forward by government, philanthropic and private sector luminaries are misleading.

Malthus's ghost returns

The early 2008 food price crisis has often been wrongly associated with the 2008-09 global financial crisis. The number of hungry in the world was said to have risen to over a billion, feeding a resurgence of neo-Malthusianism.

Agribusiness advocates fed such fears, insisting that food production must double by 2050 and that high-yielding industrial agriculture, under the auspices of agribusiness, is the only solution. In fact, however, the world is mainly fed by hundreds of millions of small-scale, often called family farmers who produce over two-thirds of developing countries' food.

Contrary to conventional wisdom, neither food scarcity nor poor physical access are the main causes of food insecurity and hunger. Instead, Reuters has observed a 'global grain glut', with surplus cereal stocks piling up.

Meanwhile, poor production, processing and storage facilities cause food losses of an average of about a third of developing countries' output. A similar share is believed lost in rich countries due to wasteful food storage, marketing and consumption behaviour.

Nevertheless, despite grain abundance, the 2018 State of Food Insecurity report - by the Rome-based United Nations food agencies led by the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) - reported rising chronic and severe hunger or undernourishment involving more than 800 million.

Political, philanthropic and corporate leaders have promised to help struggling African and other countries grow more food by offering to improve farming practices. New seed and other technologies would modernise those left behind.

But producing more food, by itself, does not enable the hungry to eat. Thus, agribusiness and its philanthropic promoters are often the problem, not the solution, in feeding the world.

Family farmers lack power

Eating Tomorrow addresses related questions such as: Why doesn't rising global food production feed the hungry? How can we 'feed the world' of rising populations and unsustainable pressure on land, water and other natural resources that farmers need to grow food?

Drawing on five years of extensive fieldwork in Southern Africa, Mexico, India and the US Midwest, Wise concludes that the problem is essentially one of power. He shows how powerful business interests influence government food and agricultural policies to favour large farms.

This is typically at the expense of 'family' farmers, who grow most of the world's food, but also involves putting consumers and others at risk, e.g., due to agrochemical use. His many examples detail not only the many problems small-scale farmers face, but also their typically constructive responses despite lack of support, if not worse, from most governments:

 In Mexico, trade liberalisation following the 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) swamped the country with cheap, subsidised US maize and pork, accelerating migration from the countryside. Apparently, this was actively encouraged by transnational pork producers employing 'undocumented' and un-unionised Mexican workers willing to accept low wages and poor working conditions.

 In Malawi, large government subsidies encouraged farmers to buy commercial fertilisers and seeds from US agribusinesses such as Monsanto (now Bayer-owned), but to little effect, as their productivity and food security stagnated or even deteriorated. Meanwhile, Monsanto took over the government seed company, favouring its own patented seeds at the expense of productive local varieties, while a former senior Monsanto official co-authored the national seed policy that threatens to criminalise farmers who save, exchange and sell seeds instead!

 In Zambia, greater use of seeds and fertilisers from agribusiness tripled maize production without reducing the country's very high rates of poverty and malnutrition. Meanwhile, as the government provides 250,000-acre 'farm blocks' to foreign investors, family farmers struggle for title to farm land.

In Mozambique too, the government gives away vast tracts of farm land to foreign investors. Meanwhile, women-led cooperatives successfully run their own native maize seed banks.

The US state of Iowa promotes vast monocultures of maize and soybean to feed hogs and bioethanol production rather than 'feed the world'.

A large Mexican farmer cooperative launched an 'agro-ecological revolution', while the old government kept trying to legalise Monsanto's controversial genetically modified (GM) maize. Farmers have thus far halted the Monsanto plan, arguing that GM corn threatens the rich diversity of native Mexican varieties.

Eating better

Much of the research for the book was done in 2014-15, when Barack Obama was US president, although the narrative begins with developments and policies following the 2008 food price crisis, during George W Bush's last year in the White House. The book tells a story of US big business' influence on policies enabling more aggressive transnational expansion.

Yet, Wise remains optimistic, emphasising that the world can feed the hungry, many of whom are family farmers. Despite the challenges they face, many family farmers are finding innovative and effective ways to grow more and better food. Hungry farmers are nourishing their life-giving soils using more ecologically sound practices to plant a diversity of native crops, instead of using costly chemicals for export-oriented monocultures. Wise advocates support for farmers' efforts to improve their soil, output and well-being.

Unfortunately, most national governments and international institutions still favour large-scale, high-input, industrial agriculture, neglecting more sustainable solutions offered by family farmers and the need to improve the well-being of poor farmers.

Undoubtedly, many new agricultural techniques offer the prospect of improving the welfare of farmers, not only by increasing productivity and output, but also by limiting costs, using scarce resources more effectively, and reducing the drudgery of farm work.

But the world must recognise that farming may no longer be viable for many who face land, water and other resource constraints, unless they get better access to such resources. Meanwhile, malnutrition of various types affects well over two billion people in the world, and industrial agriculture contributes about 30% of greenhouse gas emissions.

Going forward, it will be important to ensure affordable, healthy and nutritious food supplies for all, mindful not only of food and water safety, but also of various pollution threats. A related challenge will be to enhance dietary diversity affordably to overcome micronutrient deficiencies and diet-related non-communicable diseases for all. - IPS                      

Jomo Kwame Sundaram, a former economics professor, was United Nations Assistant Secretary-General for Economic Development, and received the Wassily Leontief Prize for Advancing the Frontiers of Economic Thought.

*Third World Resurgence No. 335/336, 2018, pp 13-14